<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Film Fund-amentals: Analyzing Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditspectrum.com/2010/06/film-fund-amentals-analyzing-hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditspectrum.com/2010/06/film-fund-amentals-analyzing-hollywood/</link>
	<description>Bringing science back to financial engineering</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.creditspectrum.com/2010/06/film-fund-amentals-analyzing-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 04:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creditspectrum.com/?p=1257#comment-476</guid>
		<description>It is necessary to partition off road unexpectedly.
It is necessary to provoke wreck of cars.
What for all it?
All want to look, how Green Rostock makes the way from under asphalt.
The life on the screen appears in the same way.
The essence consists in it.
It costs of money.
How is it to count?

Dreams are embodied at images.
It cannot be rolled up in asphalt.
It settles in minds of people.
It gives new green sprouts.
It costs of money.
But money costs no of it.
Therefore money does not suffice.
It is necessary that money worked correctly to raise a face-value of money. 
The life on the screen costs more than money.
It means that the life on the screen is gained for money, but not for the sake of money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is necessary to partition off road unexpectedly.<br />
It is necessary to provoke wreck of cars.<br />
What for all it?<br />
All want to look, how Green Rostock makes the way from under asphalt.<br />
The life on the screen appears in the same way.<br />
The essence consists in it.<br />
It costs of money.<br />
How is it to count?</p>
<p>Dreams are embodied at images.<br />
It cannot be rolled up in asphalt.<br />
It settles in minds of people.<br />
It gives new green sprouts.<br />
It costs of money.<br />
But money costs no of it.<br />
Therefore money does not suffice.<br />
It is necessary that money worked correctly to raise a face-value of money.<br />
The life on the screen costs more than money.<br />
It means that the life on the screen is gained for money, but not for the sake of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin D</title>
		<link>http://www.creditspectrum.com/2010/06/film-fund-amentals-analyzing-hollywood/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Marvin D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creditspectrum.com/?p=1257#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Several years ago I was an independent business finance consultant.  I did various kinds of projects from real estate developments to equipment leasing.  At some point I was approached by film producers seeking finance for a number of small budget film projects.  

Intrigued with the idea of dabbling in the entertainment industry I signed on, deluded with the notion that film finance was like any other financing proposal.  It was only after struggling along unsuccessfully for a number of months that I discovered the unique, convoluted even bizarre nature of film finance.  

Structuring film financing is more wacky than a B reel monster film from the 50&#039;s and bears little resemblance to what might be considered normal business practice.  I never did successfully finance a single project, but along the road I learned that this is an area best left to those with special skills and a long list private sources for whom risk is a relative term.  

After my experiences I really came away wondering how any film ever gets made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I was an independent business finance consultant.  I did various kinds of projects from real estate developments to equipment leasing.  At some point I was approached by film producers seeking finance for a number of small budget film projects.  </p>
<p>Intrigued with the idea of dabbling in the entertainment industry I signed on, deluded with the notion that film finance was like any other financing proposal.  It was only after struggling along unsuccessfully for a number of months that I discovered the unique, convoluted even bizarre nature of film finance.  </p>
<p>Structuring film financing is more wacky than a B reel monster film from the 50&#8242;s and bears little resemblance to what might be considered normal business practice.  I never did successfully finance a single project, but along the road I learned that this is an area best left to those with special skills and a long list private sources for whom risk is a relative term.  </p>
<p>After my experiences I really came away wondering how any film ever gets made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

