Clive Crook of Bloomberg View applauds Ann Rutledge and Robert Litan's Brookings study, "A Real Fix for Credit Ratings": "The [rating agencies'] failure to do their appointed jobs was as spectacular as that of the banks, and at the very center of the whole mess---yet the...

Greg Gordon of McClatchy's Washington Bureau writes about the Brookings study by Ann Rutledge and Robert Litan, which calls for a single, public, numerical (ordinal, not cardinal), benchmark credit scale. Gordon quotes a recent interview with Rutledge: "'If we don’t have objective measures of credit...

David Nicklaus, business columnist at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, quotes Rutledge on what it would mean for structured finance to replace the familiar AAA, AA, BB etc. scale with a numerical scale: "Creating a numerical score for structured debt is like putting a speed limit on...

Talking about the SEC is like talking about "the Chinese government," "the United States," or any other large assemblage of people that are made up of different factions with different personalities, subcultures, policy preferences and goals. The SEC Division of Investment Management, in 1992, published a...

R&R has 8 out of the 10 required letters for NRSRO designation. The Office of Credit Ratings (OCR) at the SEC only considers one valid. A key area of disagreement is whether our valuations, calculated directly from our ratings, deserve to be considered "nationally recognized...

President and CEO of the Philadelphia FRB Charles Plosser hits the nail on the head in his column in Mortgage Orb when he points out that Fed policy is weakening the U.S. economy. He runs through the litany of measures, "liquidity" provision, quantitative easing, asset...

Widespread confusion appears to exist among the investing public as to the potential distinction between ratings and valuations. Are they the same? If not, how exactly are they different, and is one more “useful” than the other as a financial measure? Even the SEC is now confused, something quite surprising in light of the fact that they are supposedly regulating rating agencies. Given the importance of this practical distinction, it’s worth spending a few minutes dispelling rumors, lies and innuendos. At a fundamental level, both ideas are identical and the issue of their supposed kinship or difference makes no sense at all. It is equivalent to asking about the difference between degrees Fahrenheit and degrees Centigrade: both are temperature-measurement systems. The only difference is that one system is used in America while the other one is used in Europe and elsewhere. (Should we call this “l’exception Américaine?”) If someone now living in Paris suddenly woke up in New York, confusion would reign only until he learned the new system, which would take less than a day, or even faster if he headed to the beach when the thermometer read “30 degrees.” The point is that a self-consistent system is always usable but only makes sense within its own context. No harm will be done by using either system as long as it is used appropriately. Since a simple transformation function exists between them, any confusion on the part of a user can be cleared up immediately with a mapping function.

Overnight Marc Joffe sent a paper published 8/3/12, written by Pedro Romero at the Universidad San Francisco de Quito, entitled Why Did the US Market for Mortgage Backed Securities Unravel?  Dr. Romero explains the Financial Crisis as an instance of Gresham's Law: "Bad money drives out good if [the] exchange...

In valuing secondary market RMBS over the years, R&R discovered many servicer reporting irregularities on collateral losses. At year-end 2011, we decided to generalize our observations on the total market. We presented our findings on January 25, 2012, in “RMBS Losses in Limbo: As Bad...